The Churches of Paris, from Clovis to Charles X — Text and Context

(0 User reviews)   28
In Category - Architecture
Beale, Sophia, 1837-1920 Project Gutenberg 2012 Not confirmed
Church buildings -- France -- Paris; Paris (France) -- Buildings, structures, etc. Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 120,492
Reading time 524 min
Text sections 16

Before opening The Churches of Paris, from Clovis to Charles X — Text and Context, the edition data offers a quick orientation: 120,492 words, 8 hr 44 min estimated reading time, and 16 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 21.9 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Church buildings -- France -- Paris,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

Sophia Beale's 1893 guide to Parisian churches prioritizes historical and legendary lore over architectural treatise, contrasting medieval frescoes with classicist interiors and examining how artworks fit—or clash with—their settings.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.9/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Read the Text

the chapels of the Way of the Cross until 1830, when some senseless vandals threw them down and broke them; but the fragments were preserved, and are now in the garden of the Hôtel Cluny, a museum of fragments. The rest were replaced in the chapel, and are the fourth and fifth on each side facing the altar; all the others are new.

The pavement is modern incised stone, with incrustations of colour, representing geometrical patterns, animals, and flowers. In the apse are subjects--the _Four rivers of Paradise_, and the _Seven Sacraments_ in the form of rivers. The altar is an exact copy of the original one. Above it is the tribune and canopy where the relics were exposed, with a spiral staircase leading up to it;[8] the northern one is ancient, and was found by Alexandre Lenoir, in the Musée des Petits-Augustins, where for half a century it had been attached to the _façade_ of the Château de Gaillon, a 16th century work, now in the court of the Ecole des Beaux-Arts. On one side of the apse is a very beautiful _piscina_. Part of the _baldachino_ is ancient, and the rest has been restored from old drawings.

Formerly several statues occupied places in the chapel; one, a terra-cotta Notre-Dame de Pitié, by Germain Pilon, which is now in the chapel of the military school of St. Cyr. A 16th century _jubé_, with altars attached to it, marked the nave from the chancel. The retables of these altars (now in the Louvre) were in enamel, signed and dated Léonard Limousin, 1533, and contain portraits of François I. and his second wife, Eléonore d'Autriche, sister of Charles V. and of Henri II. and Catherine de'Medici, all kneeling. The choir was filled with carved stalls of the time of Henri II. At the four corners of the altar pavement, Henri III. elevated bronze Angels upon black marble pillars. On the _retro_-altar was a silver-gilt model of the chapel, three or four feet high, executed in 1631 by Pijard, goldsmith, and guardian of the relics. This contained some of the treasures, and was considered a very fine work of art, costing some 13,000 _livres_. There is an excellent drawing of the original altar in Viollet-le-Duc's dictionary. Canon Morand tells us, in his history of the chapel, that the _ciborium_, which is usually placed in the tabernacle, was here suspended in front of the altar--probably the _retro_-altar, as in the engraving of the High Altar in the Canon's book, there is no representation of it. All the old furniture of the church has disappeared, the carved stalls, the _jubé_, the altars, and the pulpit. Upon the subject of letting, or taking money for seats or chairs in church, the Abbé waxes wrathful. Nothing is more "indécent que de vendre ou de louer des places à l'Eglise. En Angleterre et en Hollande on est assis dans les Temples sans aucun frais, et sans être interrompu par les Mandians, par les quêteurs, ou par les loueurs de chaises; en quoi les non-Catholiques nous donnent un bel exemple à suivre, si nous étions assez raisonables et assez désinterressés pour cela." This is a proof that the letting of pews which prevailed in this country some years ago was a bad departure from the free-and-open seat system of the last century; and the picture drawn of the restlessness of a French church, from the incessant perambulating of the _Suisses_, the _quêteurs_, and the chair-owners, is as true now as it was in the time of Morand.

The Canon then goes on to record the want of reverence of the congregation, how they just _half_ kneel when the bell rings; how they must needs sit, and even gossip, during the short quarter of an hour occupied by a low mass; how they take snuff and bear themselves generally, and then go out and stand about for the greater part of the day at their business.

Sophia Beale’s The Churches of Paris, from Clovis to Charles X (1893) is neither a dry catalogue of dates nor a conventional architectural handbook. Instead, it deliberately foregrounds “quaint and legendary lore,” weaving historical anecdote and archaeological detail into a narrative that treats each church as a layered artifact. Beale draws heavily on Viollet-le-Duc and Guilhermy for technical matters, but her own voice emerges in sharp observations about artistic incongruity—as when she notes that Maillot’s early-Flemish-style fresco in the Panthéon feels “as incongruous in its place as would be a van Eyck” amid neoclassical purity.

Incongruity as a Critical Lens

Beale repeatedly measures artworks against their architectural surroundings, finding mismatches that reveal deeper tensions. In the Panthéon, she contrasts Maillot’s archaic, manuscript-like fresco with J. P. Laurens’s “splendidly drawn” but “somewhat black” scenes of Saint Geneviève, which she judges “completely out of harmony with the cold, grey purity of this Classic temple.” She extends this critique to Bonnat’s Martyrdom of S. Denis, calling it “over dramatic and heavy in colour,” and to Lenepveu’s Jeanne d’Arc, which she dismisses as no exception to the rule that the saint seems “an impossibility in art.” These judgments are not mere taste; they are grounded in a consistent argument that a building’s style should govern its decoration.

The Panthéon’s Decorative Disputes

Beale devotes sustained attention to the Panthéon’s mural cycle, treating it as a case study in failed harmony. She praises Puvis de Chavannes’s panels as potential “fit pendants” to Baudry’s lost work, but laments that Delaunay died before finishing his commission. Her description of Laurens’s Death of S. Geneviève is unusually detailed: she notes the “wistful gaze of the children” and “prayerful expression of the mothers,” yet questions whether the saint might have been “a little idealised.” This blend of technical observation and aesthetic critique—she calls the picture “subdued and reposeful” despite its dramatic subject—shows Beale reading paintings as documents of artistic intention and architectural fit, not merely as illustrations.

Portraits and Politics in Sacred Space

Beale’s eye for detail extends to identifying contemporary figures in religious paintings. In Joseph Blanc’s Return of Clovis from Tolbiac, she notes that the work contains “contemporary portraits—Gambetta, Arago, Lockroy; and Coquelin figuring as a monk.” This observation, tucked into a broader discussion of academic correctness, reveals how Beale treats church art as a record of its own era’s political and cultural figures. She does not dwell on the implications, but the inclusion of such names—prominent republicans and a famous actor—suggests that the Panthéon’s decoration was as much a statement about Third Republic France as about Merovingian saints. Her matter-of-fact tone here contrasts with her sharper aesthetic judgments elsewhere.

Beale’s method—moving from architectural description to artistic critique to historical aside—makes The Churches of Paris a work best read in fragments, church by church. Readers interested in the interplay of art and architecture will find her most engaged where she finds discord; those seeking straightforward guidebook facts may need to sift. The book rewards attention to its asides, where Beale’s own preferences and prejudices emerge most clearly.

I keep thinking about how Beale wandered through those old churches, noticing where a fresco sat uneasily beside a marble altar, and it reminded me of something quieter—The Printed Book: Its History, Illustration and Adornment From the Days of Gutenberg to the Present Time — Story, Setting & Ideas—that same tender attention to how a thing’s story shapes the space it fills. Both linger like a familiar room.

There are no reviews for this eBook.

0
0 out of 5 (0 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
There are no comments for this eBook.

Reader reflection

What was your reading experience?

Capture what you thought, learned, and would like to remember.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

Where are you in your reading?

2

What was your overall reaction to the book?

3

How likely are you to recommend this book?

4

How easy was the book to follow?

Related eBooks