A Journal of the Expedition to Carthagena, with Notes In Answer to a Late Pamphlet Entitled, An account of the Expedition to Carthagena — Reading Notes

(0 User reviews)   1359
In Category - Architecture
Smollett, T. (Tobias), 1721-1771 [Dubious author], Wentworth, Thomas, active 1741 [Dubious author] Project Gutenberg 2011 Not confirmed
Cartagena (Colombia) -- History -- Siege, 1741 Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 22,378
Reading time 98 min
Text sections 3

Before opening A Journal of the Expedition to Carthagena, with Notes In Answer to a Late Pamphlet Entitled, An account of the Expedition to Carthagena — Reading Notes, the edition data offers a quick orientation: 22,378 words, 1 hr 38 min estimated reading time, and 3 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 38.9 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Cartagena (Colombia) -- History -- Siege, 1741,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

A point-by-point rebuttal to a pamphlet on the 1741 siege of Cartagena, this journal uses council minutes, troop counts, and logistical details to challenge claims about command decisions, troop strength, and the role of climate in the expedition's failure.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.5/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Read the Text

Ground was clear'd, the Tents pitch'd, and the Troops under cover the same Evening.[5]

Two Coupures or Lines were begun into the Woods; one for cutting off the Communication of the Castle of _Boca-Chica_ with the City, the other for opening a way to the Skirts of the Wood, for the erecting a Battery; which last was this Day advanced 500 Yards.

Mr. _Moor_, the principal Engineer, landed in the Night; the Ordnance Ship, on which he was embarked, having been drove to _Leeward_.

_March_ the 12th, a Mortar Battery was begun, between the Forts St. _Phillip_ and St. _Jago_; and the Coupure leading to the Castle, was carried on to the Skirts of the Wood, but that for cutting off the Communication, was discontinued by the Advice of the principal Engineer.[6]

All the Negroes, and as many Soldiers as could be spared, from their other Duty, were employed in cutting Fascines and Pickets. A Traverse was raised in the Coupure leading to _Boca-Chica_, and an Epaulement was thrown up for the covering the Workmen, which were to be employed in raising the great Gun-Battery.

_March_ the 13th, A Defence was made of Casks filled with Sand, to cover the Mortar Battery from the Enemy's Fire; this Evening, (not the 17th, as the Author is pleased to alledge, Page the 10th,) it was finished, and began to play upon the Castle.[7]

The Bomb-Ketches likewise continued to throw their Shells, and it was observed that _several_ of them did not take place in the Castle. The Ground was traced out for the great Gun-Battery.[8]

The Coupure leading to the Castle of _Boca-Chica_, was enlarged. A Lieutenant Colonel's Guard was mounted to cover the Workmen to be employed on the great Gun-Battery.

The Enemy fired very smartly, both Yesterday and this Day, and killed several Men in the Camp.[9]

_March_ the 14th, the Works were carried on with all the Expedition our Circumstances would admit of; but were much retarded, not only from the Heat of the Climate, which renders _Europeans_ almost unable to support the least Fatigue, but from the Negroes throwing down their Loads, and working Tools, whenever a Shot came near them. These Difficulties having been represented to a Council of War by the principal Engineer, signifying at the same time, that an Addition of 1600 Men to the Forces then on Shore was wanting, to enable him to push on his Works with Vigour, a Demand was made of that Number of Soldiers to be landed from the Fleet, which the Admiral was pleased to refuse, alledging, that we could have no Occasion for them.

_March_ the 15th, the General, accompany'd by Mr. _Moor_ and Capt. _Knowles_ view'd the Works at the great Gun Battery, and passed the Skirts of the Wood to reconnoitre the Castle, which had then received little or no visible Damage from the Shells.

_March_ the 16th, all possible Diligence was used in cutting Fascines, sharpening Pickets, preparing Planks and timbers _&c._ for the Battery. The Artillery, and the greatest Part of the Stores, were by this Time landed,[10] of which Part was carried to the great Gun Battery.

_March_ the 17th, the Parapet of the great Gun Battery was very near raised to the Embrasures.

A Representation was made to the Admiral from a Council of War of Land Officers, of the Necessity of driving the Enemy from their Fascine Battery, which, as it was seated on the other Side the Entry into the Harbour, could not be done without the Assistance of the Fleet, otherwise the Attack upon it would have been made by a Detachment from the Land Forces on Shore.

The same Day, it was resolved in a Council of War, composed of Sea Officers, to make an Attempt on the Fascine Battery with three hundred Sailors, and _two hundred Soldiers_, detach'd from those remaining on board the Fleet.

_March_ the 18th, several of the Cannon were drawn up to the Battery, and mounted upon their Carriages.

The Enemy, having discovered our Workmen, began to fire briskly upon them from the Castle, with Stones, _&c._ A Party of the Enemy fired upon the Negroes, who were employed in the Woods in cutting Fascines; but did no other Damage than the interrupting their Work.

During the Night, the Fascine Battery was attack'd by 300 Sailors, and 200 Soldiers, who possessed themselves of it, with very little Opposition.[11]

_March_ the 19th, an Epaulement was raised to the left of the great Gun Battery, to cover it from the Fire of the Enemy's Ships of War; twelve of the Platforms were finished. The Enemy were perceived to be at Work in repairing the _Barradera_ Battery.[12]

The journal opens by framing itself as a direct answer to a pamphlet published at the close of the last session of Parliament. The author promises an “exact and faithful Journal” from the fleet’s departure from Jamaica, not merely from the landing at Cartagena. The notes are arranged to mirror the order of the pamphlet’s notes, with references so the reader can compare each answer to its original. This structural choice signals that the work is a forensic rebuttal, not a standalone narrative.

Council Resolutions and the Timing of Decisions

The journal records specific council-of-war resolutions with precise dates and ship movements. For instance, it notes that on January 22, 1740, Sir Chaloner Ogle sailed from Port-Royal Harbour, followed by Commodore Lestock on the 26th and Vice-Admiral Vernon on the 28th. The three squadrons joined on January 31 and made Cape Tiberon on February 7. The author includes the exact report from Captain Dandridge, who had looked into Port-Lewis on January 30 and seen nineteen ships of war, one carrying a flag at the main-top-mast head. These details anchor the narrative in verifiable chronology and counter any vague or self-serving accounts of the expedition’s start.

Disputed Troop Numbers and Landing Confusion

The author challenges the pamphlet’s claim that the general landed with 800 grenadiers, then re-embarked for more. The journal asserts that only Captain Dennet and five or six men leaped ashore without orders, and that the general ordered them back to prevent confusion. It states that all companies of grenadiers, even if complete, could not have exceeded 648 officers included, and that sickness had reduced them to under 400 men. The author points to the adjutant’s books as evidence. This passage reveals a pattern of disputing numerical claims and attributing disorder to specific individuals rather than to the commander’s indecision.

Climate as the Primary Cause of Misfortune

Near the end, the journal asserts that the expedition’s misfortunes “were, without Doubt, principally occasioned by the Climate.” This attribution is notable because it shifts responsibility away from command failures and onto an environmental factor beyond human control. The author also commends the pamphlet for doing “Justice” to the common soldiers, but insists that equal credit is due to the officers who led them. The closing lines appeal to the gentleman who inherited command after Lord Cathcart’s death, suggesting that he would welcome the “strictest Scrutiny” of his conduct. This rhetorical move frames the journal as a defense of the military leadership against unfair criticism.

The Role of the Council of War and the General’s Reluctance

A footnote explains that the principal council of war consisted of the two eldest army officers, the two eldest navy officers, and the governor of Jamaica when present, and that its province was to determine what enterprises should be undertaken. The journal also records that when the attack on Cartagena was first debated, the general declared he was “a Stranger in those Seas” and had no knowledge of the city’s present state, so he would join the admiral’s opinion. This admission of ignorance is presented without comment, but it undercuts any later claim that the general exercised independent judgment.

Readers should approach this journal as a partisan document that uses meticulous detail to defend a particular version of events. The author’s reliance on council minutes, troop returns, and chronological precision invites verification, but the selection of facts is itself an argument. Comparing the journal with the pamphlet it answers would reveal which claims are genuinely contested and which are matters of emphasis. The work is best read alongside other accounts of the Cartagena expedition to assess the credibility of its rebuttals.

That stern old Journal, with its ink-smudged numbers and hurt pride, reminds me of a sampler stitched in defiance—every cross-stitch a small correction, every thread a patient answer. Both share a quiet stubbornness, the belief that care, whether over troop counts or hemstitches, is its own form of love. Just as Church Needlework: A manual of practical instruction — A Closer Reading treats cloth as a record, so too does that old pamphlet treat battle as a ledger.

There are no reviews for this eBook.

0
0 out of 5 (0 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
There are no comments for this eBook.

Reader reflection

How did this book work for you?

Your answers remain private and are stored only in this browser.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

What is your current status with this title?

2

Was reading this book enjoyable?

3

Is this a title you would suggest to others?

4

How demanding did the text feel?

Related eBooks